英语翻译
Buy Damaged Stocks,Not Damaged Companies
Let’s say Wall Street is holding a sale of solid merchandise that it has to move.And let’s say you take that merchandise home only to find it doesn’t work,has a hole in it or is missing a key part.If we were on Main Street,of course,it wouldn’t matter.There are guarantees and warranties galore on Main Street.You can take anything back.
You can’t return merchandise on Wall Street and get your money back.Nope,no way.
Which is why I always say:
You have to buy damaged stocks,not damaged companies.Sometimes these buys are easy to discern.In 1998,when Cendant (CD – news – Cramer’s Take) was defrauded by the management of CUC International through a series of bogus financials,the stock went from $36 to $12 in pretty much a straight line.Was that a one-day sale that should be bought?No,that was a damaged company.It took years for Cendant to work its way back into the hearts of investors.Some say it has never recovered.
But when Eastman Chemical (EMN – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating) announced a shortfall in early 2005 because of a problem – a fixable problem – at one of its facilities,that 4-point dip was a classic panic sale,one that you had to buy.The stock subsequently moved up a quick 8 points when the division recovered in the next quarter.
Sometimes,the sales on Wall Street aren’t as obvious.I got snookered in 2004 thinking that Nortel’s (NT – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating) accounting problems were a simple sale of a damaged stock,with the company quite whole.In fact,the company was gravely damaged by an accounting fraud,and it has looked doubtful the company would ever recover.
And sometimes the sale is so steep that it looks as if something’s dreadfully wrong,when really the problem is something that over the longer term will go away.
How do we know if there is something wrong with the company instead of just the stock?I think that’s too complicated a question.What I like to do is develop a list of stocks I like very much,and when Wall Street holds an en masse sale,I like to step up to the plate.I particularly like to be ready when we have multiple selloffs in the stock market because of events unrelated to the stocks I want to buy,a major shortfall of an important bellwether stock,or perhaps some macro event that doesn’t affect my micro-driven story.
Of course,sometimes you just have to deduce that the company’s fortunes haven’t really changed,and the fundamentals that triggered the selloff (either in the market or in the company) will be something that will reverse themselves shortly.But you never know.Which is,again,why I think that rule no.3 must be obeyed.If you don’t buy all the stock at once,and if you take your time,it is more likely that you won’t be left holding a huge chunk of merchandise when more bad news comes around the corner.
人气:318 ℃ 时间:2020-04-04 19:47:50
解答
买股票,不损坏公司利益我们说,华尔街正举办一个销售商品的活动.让我们说参加的商家,发现没多大作用,有些缺陷或丢失了一个重要组成部分.如果我们是在大街上,当然,这不会有问题.有担保、保证堆积如山的大街上.你可以做...
推荐
猜你喜欢
- 小雨滴落在花雨伞上.请问怎样改为拟人句?
- 月球自转一周需多少小时
- 当k为何值时,函数y=(k-1)x的k的平方是正比例函数?
- way在什么时候当作可数名词,什么时候当做不可数名词?
- 184÷4=;217÷7=;633÷3,448÷4=,246÷6,273÷ 3,336÷3
- 现有11包味精,其中10包质量相同,一包质量不足.至少称几次能保证找出这包味精找出来?
- 明明用一种长3厘米,宽2厘米的长方形硬卡纸,摆成一个最小的正方形,这个正方形的面积是多少平方厘米?
- 人体中的红细胞为什么不能翻译蛋白质:-)