帮忙做一篇英语阅读文章!
Mergers(企业合并) are always headline news.Some financial commentators even regard them as an indicator of the economic health of a nation.It is strange when you consider that most mergers fail.The deals themselves go through,and regardless of the high costs,the bankers get paid.But then the economies of scale don’t prove good as expected.Employees become nervous and less efficient as they worry about losing their jobs.
Statistics show that over half of mergers fail to fulfill the expected strategic objective.Given all this,it is interesting to see a merger which is successful.And that is what seems to have happened when Promo and Truck Ads merged.
Lendel started Promo in 1991,the same year Watson founded Truck Ads.Both companies did the same thing:they ran poster campaigns on trucks for major advertisers.It looked so easy and profitable that lots of small operators came into the business,which worried both of them because they felt that these new companies did not really know what they were doing.This,they felt,could have a negative effect on all companies in this sector.So Lendel and Watson formed a trade association to protect the reputation of their businesses.
Once they had the market largely to themselves,Lendel and Watson competed in some situations and cooperated in others.Whenever one had more campaigns than they could handle,they would subcontract to the other.Finally,Lendel suggested that her company buy Truck Ads as Lendel and Watson had known and respected each other for years.They had many business values in common,so they knew they would lose business opportunities if they did not get bigger.In negotiations Lendel and Watson were not afraid to handle the problems that so many companies avoid.There was no nonsense about joint leadership or everything staying the same.
Merging is never easy.‘Once the merger had gone through,I was relieved that there had been no lay-offs,’ says Lendel.‘I hadn’t realized,though,how much loyalty there was to the Truck Ads brand.This impressed me but also worried me as we had wiped away the brand overnight.So I brought in policies to make everyone feel part of the team and then I saw every employee individually to explain the advantages of the merger for them.’
74.During negotiations,Lendel and Watson decided that_________________.
A.the two of them could not work together.
B.one person would be in charge of the new company.
C.there would be no major changes in the new company.
D.they would merge some small operators later.
但是我选的是B。我对文中“There was no nonsense about joint leadership or everything staying the same.”这句话始终不理解。我认为这句话说的是在合并中没有“联合管理或一切照旧”的NONSENSE!而我的老师说是在谈判阶段没有关于这个问题的废话,即顺利通过。我非常不理解。希望有人能帮我解决。
人气:243 ℃ 时间:2019-11-03 22:02:43
解答
你老师是对的,其实就算按照你的理解,没有“联合管理或一切照旧”的NONSENSE,可以翻译成没有“联合管理或一切照旧”的争议废话,也就是谈判决定联合管理或一切照旧.
推荐
猜你喜欢
- 二点九乘以零点四五加上零点二九乘以四点二加上零点零二九乘以一拾三的简便方法?
- 一条路,两天修完,第一天修全长的七分之三,第一天比第二天少修30米,这条路全长多少米
- 用配方法解一元二次方程:2x²+1=3x
- ____i went to bed too late last night,i went to work late this morning
- 在山顶 用英语怎么说
- 函数f(x)的定义域为R,且满足:f(x)是偶函数,f(x-1)是奇函数.若f(0.5)=9,则f(8.5)等于的求解过程中,
- 谁能介绍几句描写心情失落,寂寞的诗句啊.
- 超市出售8筐胡萝卜,每框25千克,占售出冬瓜和南瓜两种瓜总数的八分之五,售出的南瓜占冬瓜和南瓜总数的